The unsuccessful implementation of CLT in an English class: A narrative inquiry by a pre-service teacher

Authors

  • Yuyus Saputra Universitas Siliwangi
  • Neni Marlina Universitas Siliwangi
  • Kastam Syamsi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Nabila Nara Lestari Universitas Siliwangi
  • Asri Siti Fatimah Universitas Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v10i1.349

Keywords:

Communicative Language Teaching, Pre-Service Teacher, Teaching Practicum, Narrative Inquiry

Abstract

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is widely promoted as an approach that supports meaningful interaction in English as a Foreign Language classroom. However, its classroom implementation can be challenging for pre-service teachers who are still developing pedagogical and classroom-management competence. This study explored factors that constrained the implementation of CLT during a teaching practicum. It employed an autobiographical narrative inquiry centred on the experience of a pre-service English teacher-researcher. The study was conducted in a ninth-grade class of 38 students, where CLT was implemented in eight 90-minute meetings. Two students with contrasting levels of English achievement were purposively selected to provide complementary perspectives on the teacher-researcher’s narrative. Data were collected through a self-reflective narrative frame, individual semi-structured interviews consisting of 15 questions and lasting approximately 15–20 minutes, and lesson-plan analysis. The data were analyzed thematically by familiarizing the data, coding meaningful segments, developing and reviewing themes, naming the themes, and integrating evidence across the three data sources. The findings identified three context-specific constraints: students’ limited engagement and communication, an unsupportive classroom environment, and the teacher-researcher’s insufficient preparedness, including limited instructional time and an incomplete understanding of students’ needs. The study concludes that CLT implementation during a teaching practicum requires gradual linguistic and affective scaffolding, responsive lesson planning, supportive peer norms, and sustained mentoring for pre-service teachers.

References

Ali, Z., Masroor, F., & Khan, T. (2020). Creating positive classroom environment for learners’ motivation towards communicative competence in the English language. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 57, 317–328. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339933617

Andersen, S. C., Humlum, M. K., & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(27), 7481–7484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516686113

Asrul, A., & Dahlan, S. (2022). The use of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) method in improving students’ English vocabulary. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(4), 541. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i4.5669

Asvio, N., & Batusangkar, I. (2017). The influence of learning motivation and learning environment on undergraduate students’ learning achievement of management of Islamic education, study program of IAIN Batusangkar in 2016. Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research ISSN, 2(2), 16–31.

Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002

Chang, A. N., & Suparmi, S. (2020). The implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) and factors hindering teachers from implementing it in high school. Al-TA'DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 46-56.

Damayanti, M. E., & Listyani, L. (2020). An analysis of students’ speaking anxiety in academic speaking class. ELTR Journal, 4(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v4i2.70

Danibao, B. K., & Tari, M. J. A. R. (2023). English language teaching through Communicative Method: A qualitative study of pre-service teachers’ perceptions. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(6), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.433

Doeur, B. (2022). Implementation of Communicative Language Teaching: Cambodian EFL teachers’ attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1529a

Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and E-learning Research, 7(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109

Haliwanda, U. (2021). The effect of using the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach In teaching speaking. Elite: English and Literature Journal, 8(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.24252/10.24252/elite.v8i2a4

Ilmudinulloh, R., Bustomi, A., Pratiwi, W. R., & Ilyas, M. (2022). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach in Kampung Inggris Pare in the new normal period. (JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran) Kajian Dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran), 9(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v9i92022p250

Ivan, S. S., Marintan, S., Vivi, H. E., Achida, V. N., & Erikson, S. (2020). Analysis of students’ vocabulary in learning English. 3(2), 469–475. https://journal.ipm2kpe.or.id/index.php/LEEA/article/view/1017

Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272

Maryam, S. (2020). Utilizing Communicative Language Games to improve students’ speaking ability. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v8i3.2733

Nababan, J. A., & Amalia, L. L. (2021). EFL pre-service teachers’ challenges in teaching practice program: A narrative inquiry. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 546(Conaplin 2020), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.043

Nam, H. (2023). Challenges and Constraints of Implementing Communicative Language Teaching: Teacher-Related vs. Non-Teacher-Related Factors. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1), 75–96. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/263434

Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2021). “You really brought all your feelings out” – Scaffolding students to identify the socio-emotional and socio-cognitive challenges in collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100536

Pitikornpuangpetch, C., & Suwanarak, K. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and teaching practices about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in a Thai EFL context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 1–27.

Suparlan, S. (2021). Factors Contributing Students’ Speaking Anxiety. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i2.3321

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30