Peer Review Process

All manuscripts will be reviewed with a Double-Blind Review system, Manuscripts from the author will go to the Editor in Chief who then transfers it to the relevant Editor Section for further handling. The Editors' Section will request at least two review partners to review the manuscript. Based on comments from Reviewers and Section Editors, Editor-in-Chief will make decisions on the manuscript.

All submitted manuscript will be screened as follow :

• Editor collect the submitting article

• The editor section evaluate the manuscript (the aims, scope, writing style,  the manuscript will be rejected if doesn't meet with criteria )

• Similarity will be checked using turnitin. If more than 30% plagiarism is found, the manuscript will be rejected and the author will be contacted via email

• Section editor send the manuscript to reviewers

• The reviewers send back the reviewed article to section editor with revised if necessary

• Editor make a decision ( with criteria :reject, major revision, minor revision, accept, revision and resubmit)

• The decision is informed to the author via email

• If there is a revision, the author must revise the manuscript and return it to the editor immediately (maximum 2 weeks). If the return is late (more than three months, it will be considered as a new manuscript submission)

• If there is no need for revision, the manuscript enters the layout editor before publishing